On April 30, 2026, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026 (H.R. 7567). The legislation extends agricultural programs through 2031 and contains significant national security elements, beyond the headline coverage of food stamp cuts and pesticide liability changes. Notably, the bill does not impose a sweeping ban
Trump 2.0 tariff tracker
According to President Trump, “Tariff is the most beautiful word in the dictionary.” Throughout his presidential campaign, Trump promised to use tariffs as a central part of his foreign policy strategy. His America First Trade Policy memorandum also directs the administration to review various tariff- and tariff-adjacent levers the United States could use to further
SCOTUS strikes down IEEPA tariffs; leaves refund question open
Earlier today, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump. By a 6-3 majority, the Court held that the phrase “regulate . . . importation,” as used in the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), does not include the power to impose tariffs.
As a result of the Court’s ruling
FCC announces enforcement case relating to Team Telecom commitments
- On January 8, 2026, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) announced its first enforcement action based on a failure to comply with Team Telecom Letter of Agreement (LOA) commitments.
- After violating the terms of a Team Telecom LOA by failing to screen foreign person employees and allowing foreign person employees to access U.S.
Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act reporting requirements
- On December 29, 2025, the U.S. Department of Agriculture announced an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) relating to the Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act of 1978 (AFIDA), specifically to address the increased national security attention to foreign ownership and substantial control of agricultural land.
- AFIDA requires certain foreign persons to report interests
Tariff refunds: What U.S. importers should know as the Supreme Court weighs the tariffs’ legality
During the Supreme Court’s oral argument in Learning Resources v. Trump last month, Justice Barrett asked counsel for the private plaintiffs about the tariff refund process if his clients prevail. After some back and forth, she summarized: “So a mess?”
Although the Court has not yet announced when an opinion may be released, entries subject